cjdt: Judicial Reappointment Evaluations
DC Home Mayor DC Guide Residents Business Visitors DC Government Kids

Commission on Judicial Disabilities & Tenure

CJDT HOME
CJDT HOME
ABOUT CJDT
SERVICES
SERVICES
INFORMATION
INFORMATION
ONLINE SERVICE
  REQUESTS

ONLINE SERVICE
  REQUESTS

About CJDT
How to Reach Us
Ask the Director
FOIA Requests
News Room
Performance
Site Map
Complaint Process
Judicial Misconduct
    Investigations

Judicial Reappointment
    Evaluations

Senior Judge
    Recommendations

Annual Report
Code of Judicial
    Conduct

Complaint Form
Determinations and
    Investigations

FAQs
Reappointment
    Evaluations and
    Recommendations

Commision Members
Commission Rules and Regulations

Judicial Reappointment Evaluations 

In addition to our disciplinary function, the Commission has the responsibility to determine whether or not a sitting judge whose term is expiring, and who seeks a new term, is to be reappointed.  The Home Rule Act requires that the Commission file with the President a written evaluation of the judicial candidate’s performance during the term of office, and his or her fitness for reappointment to another term.  Under the Judicial Efficiency and Improvement Act, the Commission in its evaluation is required to place a judge in one of three categories.  If the Commission evaluates the judge as “well qualified” the judge is automatically reappointed to a new 15–year term, if the Commission evaluates the judge as “qualified”, the President may, if he chooses, re-nominate the judge subject to Senate confirmation; if the Commission evaluates the judge as “unqualified”, the judge is ineligible for reappointment.